AI Heuristic Evaluation Recommendation - Vulnerability Explanation
FigJam
Heuristic Evaluation:Resulting Recommendations
Heuristic Category |
Ask yourself these questions… |
Finding |
Size |
SM or .com |
Recommendation |
|
Discoverability | How do you find out this feature exists? If someone enables it for you, how do you find out you have it? |
See Vulnerability resolution eval (same notes) |
Low |
Small |
.com |
- Suggest converting the containers title to be a higher Header number so it's at least at the same level as the other sections. |
Learnability | After it is enabled, how do you access it the first time and learn how to use it? How easy is it to find it? Does the location match the task workflow? |
See Vulnerability resolution eval (same notes) |
Low |
Medium |
.com |
- Recommend trying out other treatments to move access to this feature to be closer to the Vuln title or description. |
Documentation and help | Are the docs findable, accurate and helpful? |
- Docs are accessible from feaure drawer |
Major |
Small |
.com |
- Recommend adding a link to docs from explanation drawer |
Visibility of system status | How do you know if the feature is on or off? How do you know how and even if, you can change that status? |
- It's unclear why the Send code w/ prompt checkbox is disabled. |
Low |
Small |
.com |
- Recommend adding a tooltip that explains this. |
Communicating intent and context setting | How easy is it to initiate an interaction with the AI feature? How do you know what you can ask and how to ask it? |
- In the Send code w/ prompt section, It’s not immediately clear that this content is the user’s code. |
Low |
Small |
.com |
- Recommend adding commented out code or some sort of note that more clearly communicates which is thee code being sent. |