Commit 9e78949e authored by Sid Sijbrandij's avatar Sid Sijbrandij

Merge branch 'gitlab_flow_edit' into 'master'

Gitlab flow edit

Changed GitHub Flow links

See merge request !201
parents 9f939c96 a68a3f65
......@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ After getting used to these three steps the branching model becomes the challeng
Since many organizations new to git have no conventions how to work with it, it can quickly become a mess.
The biggest problem they run into is that many long running branches that each contain part of the changes are around.
People have a hard time figuring out which branch they should develop on or deploy to production.
Frequently the reaction to this problem is to adopt a standardized pattern such as [git flow](http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/) and [GitHub flow]()
Frequently the reaction to this problem is to adopt a standardized pattern such as [git flow](http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/) and [GitHub flow](https://guides.github.com/introduction/flow/index.html)
We think there is still room for improvement and will detail a set of practices we call GitLab flow.
# Git flow and its problems
......@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ And doing releases doesn't automatically mean also doing hotfixes.
![Master branch with feature branches merged in](github_flow.png)
In reaction to git flow a simpler alternative was detailed, [GitHub flow](http://scottchacon.com/2011/08/31/github-flow.html).
In reaction to git flow a simpler alternative was detailed, [GitHub flow](https://guides.github.com/introduction/flow/index.html).
This flow has only feature branches and a master branch.
This is very simple and clean, many organizations have adopted it with great success.
Atlassian recommends [a similar strategy](http://blogs.atlassian.com/2014/01/simple-git-workflow-simple/) although they rebase feature branches.
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment