Commit 66fa4b09 authored by Marin Jankovski's avatar Marin Jankovski

Merge branch 'fix-edit-note-with-votes' into 'master'

Fix server error when editing a note to "+1" or "-1"

### Summary

If a user edits a comment with "+1" or "-1" in the beginning, the POST returns an Internal Server error. (issue #1151). This merge request resolves that error.

### Steps to reproduce

1. Comment on an issue with "Test comment".
2. Edit the issue.
3. Write "+1" and click "Save Comment".

### Expected behavior

The edited note should be saved and refreshed. Any previous upvotes/downvotes from the user should contain a strikethrough.

### Observed behavior

Internal Error

### Relevant logs

Started PUT "/avocode/avocode-manager/notes/4996" for at 2015-02-28 17:11:53 +0100
Processing by Projects::NotesController#update as JS
Parameters: {"utf8"=>"✓", "authenticity_token"=>"*removed*", "note"=>{"note"=>"+1\r\n\r\nYes"}, "commit"=>"Save Comment", "project_id"=>"avocode/avocode-manager", "id"=>"4996"}
Completed 500 Internal Server Error in 86ms
ActionView::Template::Error (undefined method `each' for nil:NilClass):
28: %span.note-last-update
29: = note_timestamp(note)
31: - if note.superceded?(@notes)
32: - if note.upvote?
34: %i.fa.fa-thumbs-up
app/models/note.rb:495:in `superceded?'
app/views/projects/notes/_note.html.haml:31:in `_app_views_projects_notes__note_html_haml___812277000516355462_69988235638820'
app/controllers/projects/notes_controller.rb:71:in `note_to_html'
app/controllers/projects/notes_controller.rb:103:in `render_note_json'
app/controllers/projects/notes_controller.rb:39:in `block (2 levels) in update'
app/controllers/projects/notes_controller.rb:38:in `update'

### Fix

It turns out no tests were present for the "Edit Issue" functionality. I added spinach tests to exercise this and reproduced the error.

Most of the routes in `notes_controller.rb` appear to render all notes for the given discussion. `_form.html.haml` needs the full list of notes commented by the user to add strikethroughs for older upvotes/downvotes. However, only the `index` route appeared to obtain this information. The fix is to add a `before_filter` to obtain all the user's notes beforehand, except in the delete case where this information is not needed.

Things to watch: `NotesFinder` needs `target_type` and `target_id` to determine what to do. I'm not sure if there is a conscious effort to phase these keywords out in favor of `noteable_type` and `noteable_id`.

See merge request !360
parents 8c47a72a b8c9257f
Pipeline #3954 failed with stage