Improve consistency of 'nameOverride' and/or 'XyzComponentName' usage
The following discussion from !619 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@WarheadsSE started a discussion: (+2 comments) Question: We changes this to
nameOverride
in theRedisConfigMaps
, so this is inconsistent. Should they be the same?- Which should they be?
-
nameOverride
is used seemingly "once" to setcomponentName
. Would be be cleaner to simply make use of it within theif IsChartVersionOlderThan
?
There are multiple mashed uses / non-uses of
nameOverride
versusXyzComponentName()
, and some previously werecomponentName
instead ofXyzComponentName()
. Can we be consistent and clear on which, when, and why?