Commit b20f3568 authored by Mark Pundsack's avatar Mark Pundsack

Replace with editors note

parent bf97a30c
Pipeline #19154414 passed with stages
in 10 minutes and 11 seconds
......@@ -299,9 +299,9 @@ small companies would value all this automation, and everything else, but
they’re not going to get as much incremental value out of it, as a larger
company would.
The other way to look at it is that this is pretty advanced stuff, and frankly,
~~The other way to look at it is that this is pretty advanced stuff, and frankly,
it doesn’t deserve to be, free, open source. It’s probably really complicated
stuff, and you’re going to have to pay there. Maybe there’d be levels to it,
stuff, and you’re going to have to pay there.~~ *[Editor's note: Advancedness is not a criteria in open sourcing or not open sourcing. There are advanced features that are open source such as [Review Apps](/features/review-apps/). There are basic features that are proprietary such as [File Locking](/features/file-locking/). The criteria we use to decide which version the features go in are documented on our [stewardship page](https://about.gitlab.com/stewardship/#what-features-are-ee-only]).]* Maybe there’d be levels to it,
right? There’d be a version that gives you an alert: we’ll run this test once a
day. Or even just have a blog post about how to do this: you set up a recurring,
scheduled pipeline job, once a day, to test if any of your dependencies have
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment