Skip to content
GitLab
Next
Menu
Why GitLab
Pricing
Contact Sales
Explore
Why GitLab
Pricing
Contact Sales
Explore
Sign in
Get free trial
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
R
readiness
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Iterations
Wiki
Requirements
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Locked files
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
Repository analytics
Code review analytics
Issue analytics
Insights
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Privacy statement
Keyboard shortcuts
?
What's new
4
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
GitLab.com
GitLab Infrastructure Team
readiness
Commits
bbba21c7
Commit
bbba21c7
authored
1 year ago
by
Michelle Gill
Committed by
Bob Van Landuyt
1 year ago
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
s/feature/use-case
parent
1a8363e3
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request
!166
AI-gateway API & architecture
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
library/ai-gateway/index.md
+2
-2
2 additions, 2 deletions
library/ai-gateway/index.md
with
2 additions
and
2 deletions
library/ai-gateway/index.md
+
2
−
2
View file @
bbba21c7
...
...
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Because the API of the AI-gateway will be consumed by a wide variety
of GitLab instances, it is important that we design a stable, yet
flexible API.
To do this, we can implement an API-endpoint per
featur
e we
To do this, we can implement an API-endpoint per
use-cas
e we
build. This means that the interface between GitLab and the AI-gateway
is one that we build and own, and we don't tie ourselves to the
AI-provider used for a certain feature. This will allow us to change
...
...
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ GitLab instances, they differ on these items:
features that already partially exist does not mean we need to exclude
new features using gRPC or Websockets. For example: Chat features
might be better served by streaming requests and responses. Since we
are suggesting an endpoint per
featur
e, different features could also
are suggesting an endpoint per
use-cas
e, different features could also
opt for different protocols, as long as we keep cross-version
compatibility in mind.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment