2023-01-23: delete insecure firewall rules in the default VPC in gprd
Production Change
Change Summary
In https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gl-security/security-operations/infrastructure-security/bau/-/issues/238 we've identified that https://console.cloud.google.com/networking/firewalls/details/default-allow-ssh?project=gitlab-production is an insecure firewall rule. Luckily we don't have anything attached to it so we can delete it to prevent mistakes.
We did this in pre and gstg in #8260 (closed). Noticed that in pre and gstg we deleted the VPC as well but this wasn't a good idea because it resulted in terraform state drift, which we'll be fixing with https://ops.gitlab.net/gitlab-com/gl-infra/config-mgmt/-/merge_requests/4844
Change Details
- Services Impacted - ServiceGCP
-
Change Technician -
@steveazz - Change Reviewer - @ahmadsherif
- Time tracking - 30
- Downtime Component - none
Detailed steps for the change
Change Steps - steps to take to execute the change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - Estimated Time to Complete in Minutes
-
Set label changein-progress /label ~change::in-progress -
Take a screen of the firewall rules -
Validate no VM are running in the defaultVPC:gcloud --project='gitlab-production' compute instances list --filter='networkInterfaces.network:default' -
Validate no VPC peering exists: gcloud --project='gitlab-production' compute networks peerings list --network=default -
Delete all the firewall rules for the defaultVPC:gcloud --project='gitlab-production' compute firewall-rules list --filter="network:default" --format="value(name)" | parallel gcloud --project='gitlab-production' compute firewall-rules delete --quite {} -
Validate that the firewall rules don't exist anymore: gcloud --project='gitlab-production' compute firewall-rules list --filter='network:default' -
Validate that there is no state drift in config-mgmtforenvironments/gprd:../../tf plan -
Set label changecomplete /label ~change::complete
Rollback
Rollback steps - steps to be taken in the event of a need to rollback this change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - 15
-
Create the firewall rules gcloud compute firewall-rules create cpallares-qa-tunnel-allow-ingress-from-iap --allow tcp:22 --network default --source-ranges 35.235.240.0/20 --project=gitlab-production gcloud compute firewall-rules create default-allow-http --allow tcp:80 --network default --source-ranges 0.0.0.0/0 --target-tags=http-server --project=gitlab-production gcloud compute firewall-rules create default-allow-https --allow tcp:443 --network default --source-ranges 0.0.0.0/0 --target-tags=https-server --project=gitlab-production gcloud compute firewall-rules create default-allow-icmp --allow icmp --network default --source-ranges 0.0.0.0/0 --priority=65534 --project=gitlab-production gcloud compute firewall-rules create default-allow-internal --allow tcp,udp,icmp --network default --source-ranges 10.128.0.0/9 --priority=65534 --project=gitlab-production gcloud compute firewall-rules create default-allow-rdp --allow tcp:3389 --network default --source-ranges 0.0.0.0/0 --priority=65534 --project=gitlab-production gcloud compute firewall-rules create default-allow-ssh --allow tcp:22 --network default --source-ranges 0.0.0.0/0 --priority=65534 --project=gitlab-production -
Set label changeaborted /label ~change::aborted
Monitoring
Key metrics to observe
None of these resources are used.
Change Reviewer checklist
-
Check if the following applies: - The scheduled day and time of execution of the change is appropriate.
- The change plan is technically accurate.
- The change plan includes estimated timing values based on previous testing.
- The change plan includes a viable rollback plan.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
-
Check if the following applies: - The complexity of the plan is appropriate for the corresponding risk of the change. (i.e. the plan contains clear details).
- The change plan includes success measures for all steps/milestones during the execution.
- The change adequately minimizes risk within the environment/service.
- The performance implications of executing the change are well-understood and documented.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
- If not, is it possible (or necessary) to make changes to observability platforms for added visibility?
- The change has a primary and secondary SRE with knowledge of the details available during the change window.
- The labels blocks deployments and/or blocks feature-flags are applied as necessary
Change Technician checklist
-
Check if all items below are complete: - The change plan is technically accurate.
- This Change Issue is linked to the appropriate Issue and/or Epic
- Change has been tested in staging and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- A dry-run has been conducted and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- The change execution window respects the Production Change Lock periods.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the change event is added to the GitLab Production calendar.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call has been informed prior to change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@sre-oncalland this issue and await their acknowledgement.) - For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call provided approval with the eoc_approved label on the issue.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the Infrastructure Manager provided approval with the manager_approved label on the issue.
- Release managers have been informed (If needed! Cases include DB change) prior to change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@release-managersand this issue and await their acknowledgment.) - There are currently no active incidents that are severity1 or severity2
- If the change involves doing maintenance on a database host, an appropriate silence targeting the host(s) should be added for the duration of the change.