2022-12-16: Upgrade HAProxy instances to t2d
Production Change
Change Summary
This change will replace HAProxy frontend instances, by switching instance type from c2 to t2d to address CPU scheduling saturation.
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gl-infra/reliability/-/issues/16496+
Change Details
- Services Impacted - ServiceHAProxy
-
Change Technician -
@f_santos - Change Reviewer - @pguinoiseau
- Time tracking - unknown
- Downtime Component - none
Detailed steps for the change
Change Steps - steps to take to execute the change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - ~12 minutes * 39 instances
-
Merge https://ops.gitlab.net/gitlab-com/gl-infra/config-mgmt/-/merge_requests/4706 -
Set label changein-progress /label ~change::in-progress -
Execute:
for i in {01..39}; do
echo "### Instance ${i}"
echo "#### Drain $((${i}+1))"
ssh "fe-$((${i}+1))-lb-gprd.c.gitlab-production.internal" "sudo /usr/local/sbin/drain_haproxy.sh -w 1"
echo "#### Drain $((${i}+2))"
ssh "fe-$((${i}+2))-lb-gprd.c.gitlab-production.internal" "sudo /usr/local/sbin/drain_haproxy.sh -w 1"
echo "#### Drain ${i}"
ssh "fe-${i}-lb-gprd.c.gitlab-production.internal" "sudo /usr/local/sbin/drain_haproxy.sh -w 120"
echo "#### Stop ${i}"
gcloud compute instances --project=gitlab-production stop "fe-${i}-lb-gprd"
gcloud compute instances --project=gitlab-production set-machine-type "fe-${i}-lb-gprd" --machine-type "t2d-standard-8"
gcloud compute instances --project=gitlab-production start "fe-${i}-lb-gprd"
done
-
Set label changecomplete /label ~change::complete
Rollback
Rollback steps - steps to be taken in the event of a need to rollback this change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) -
-
Revert https://ops.gitlab.net/gitlab-com/gl-infra/config-mgmt/-/merge_requests/4706 -
Run Change Stepsfor instances that were replaced
Monitoring
Key metrics to observe
- Metric: Service dashboard
- Location: https://dashboards.gitlab.net/d/frontend-main/frontend-overview?orgId=1
- What changes to this metric should prompt a rollback:
- Increased latency
- Drop in connection numbers
- Increase in error rate
Change Reviewer checklist
-
Check if the following applies: - The scheduled day and time of execution of the change is appropriate.
- The change plan is technically accurate.
- The change plan includes estimated timing values based on previous testing.
- The change plan includes a viable rollback plan.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
-
Check if the following applies: - The complexity of the plan is appropriate for the corresponding risk of the change. (i.e. the plan contains clear details).
- The change plan includes success measures for all steps/milestones during the execution.
- The change adequately minimizes risk within the environment/service.
- The performance implications of executing the change are well-understood and documented.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
- If not, is it possible (or necessary) to make changes to observability platforms for added visibility?
- The change has a primary and secondary SRE with knowledge of the details available during the change window.
- The labels blocks deployments and/or blocks feature-flags are applied as necessary
Change Technician checklist
-
Check if all items below are complete: - The change plan is technically accurate.
- This Change Issue is linked to the appropriate Issue and/or Epic
- Change has been tested in staging and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- A dry-run has been conducted and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- The change execution window respects the Production Change Lock periods.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the change event is added to the GitLab Production calendar.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call has been informed prior to change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@sre-oncalland this issue and await their acknowledgement.) - For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call provided approval with the eoc_approved label on the issue.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the Infrastructure Manager provided approval with the manager_approved label on the issue.
- Release managers have been informed (If needed! Cases include DB change) prior to change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@release-managersand this issue and await their acknowledgment.) - There are currently no active incidents that are severity1 or severity2
- If the change involves doing maintenance on a database host, an appropriate silence targeting the host(s) should be added for the duration of the change.
Edited by Filipe Santos