CR - GPRD - Enable glpat_autorevocation feature flag for GitLab team members and Beta customer
Production Change
Change Summary
As part of gitlab-org/gitlab#382610 (closed) we will be rolling out a user-level feature flag across GitLab team members and select beta customers. This is primarily intended to quickly allow opt-ins from various team members in advance of general availability.
The flag is already enabled for groupstatic analysis team members and as other teams opt-in will be required to mass-enable.
Below script relies off definitive list of teams that have opted-in: https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2467743
Change Details
- Services Impacted - ServiceAPI
- Change Technician - @ahanselka
- Change Reviewer - @rehab
- Time tracking - 5 minutes
- Downtime Component - None
Detailed steps for the change
Change Steps - steps to take to execute the change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - 5 minutes
-
Set label changein-progress /label ~change::in-progress -
Open rails console with write access in production -
Execute the following script
SNIPPET_URL = "https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2467743/raw/main/groups_with_direct_members.json"
FEATURE_FLAG = :gitlab_pat_auto_revocation
response = Gitlab::HTTP.get(SNIPPET_URL)
ids = JSON.parse(response.body)
puts "Loaded #{ids.size} group IDs"
before_count = Feature::FlipperGate.where(feature_key: FEATURE_FLAG.to_s).count
ids.values.each do |id|
group = Group.find_by_id(id)
unless group
puts "WARNING: #{id} not found!"
next
end
User.where(id: group.direct_members.select(:user_id)).find_each do |user|
Feature.enable(FEATURE_FLAG, user)
end
end
after_count = Feature::FlipperGate.where(feature_key: FEATURE_FLAG.to_s).count
diff_count = after_count - before_count
if diff_count == ids.size
puts "enabled for #{diff_count} members"
else
puts "WARNING: Expected feature flag to be enabled for #{ids.size} members, but only did for #{diff_count}"
end
-
Report any WARNINGmessage to the engineer requesting the change and wait for confirmation -
Set label changecomplete /label ~change::complete
Rollback
Rollback steps - steps to be taken in the event of a need to rollback this change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - Estimated Time to Complete in Minutes
-
Execute the following snippet to re-enable the feature flag for all target groups: before_count = Feature::FlipperGate.where(feature_key: FEATURE_FLAG.to_s).count ids.values.each do |id| group = Group.find_by_id(id) group && User.where(id: group.direct_members.select(:user_id)).find_each do |user| Feature.disable(FEATURE_FLAG, user) end end
-
Set label changeaborted /label ~change::aborted
Monitoring
Key metrics to observe
- Metric:
Auto-revocation sidekiq jobs- Location: https://log.gprd.gitlab.net/app/discover#.....
- What changes to this metric should prompt a rollback: Excess revocations or elevated error rate
Change Reviewer checklist
-
Check if the following applies: - The scheduled day and time of execution of the change is appropriate.
- The change plan is technically accurate.
- The change plan includes estimated timing values based on previous testing.
- The change plan includes a viable rollback plan.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
-
Check if the following applies: - The complexity of the plan is appropriate for the corresponding risk of the change. (i.e. the plan contains clear details).
- The change plan includes success measures for all steps/milestones during the execution.
- The change adequately minimizes risk within the environment/service.
- The performance implications of executing the change are well-understood and documented.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
- If not, is it possible (or necessary) to make changes to observability platforms for added visibility?
- The change has a primary and secondary SRE with knowledge of the details available during the change window.
- The labels blocks deployments and/or blocks feature-flags are applied as necessary
Change Technician checklist
-
Check if all items below are complete: - The change plan is technically accurate.
- This Change Issue is linked to the appropriate Issue and/or Epic
- Change has been tested in staging and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- A dry-run has been conducted and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- The change execution window respects the Production Change Lock periods.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the change event is added to the GitLab Production calendar.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call has been informed prior to change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@sre-oncalland this issue and await their acknowledgement.) - For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call provided approval with the eoc_approved label on the issue.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the Infrastructure Manager provided approval with the manager_approved label on the issue.
- Release managers have been informed (If needed! Cases include DB change) prior to change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@release-managersand this issue and await their acknowledgment.) - There are currently no active incidents that are severity1 or severity2
- If the change involves doing maintenance on a database host, an appropriate silence targeting the host(s) should be added for the duration of the change.
Edited by Alex Hanselka