[GRPD] Pull an authentication event
Production Change
Change Summary
I need to provide a query plan for this MR: gitlab-org/gitlab!103434 (comment 1174972977)
In order to do that, I need to know some ids to query so that my sample query returns data.
Change Details
- Services Impacted - List services
- Change Technician - DRI for the execution of this change
- Change Reviewer - DRI for the review of this change
- Time tracking - Time, in minutes, needed to execute all change steps, including rollback
- Downtime Component - If there is a need for downtime, include downtime estimate here
Detailed steps for the change
One select statement
Change Steps - steps to take to execute the change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - Estimated Time to Complete in Minutes
-
Set label changein-progress /label ~change::in-progress -
select * from authentication_events WHERE "authentication_events"."result" = 1 AND "authentication_events"."created_at" BETWEEN '2022-10-17 00:32:11.236705' AND '2022-11-14 00:32:11.236729' LIMIT 1; -
Set label changecomplete /label ~change::complete
Rollback
Rollback steps - steps to be taken in the event of a need to rollback this change
None, this is a select statement
~~Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - Estimated Time to Complete in Minutes
-
Rollback Step 1 -
Rollback Step 2 -
Set label changeaborted /label ~change::aborted~~
Monitoring
Key metrics to observe
- Metric: Metric Name
- Location: Dashboard URL
- What changes to this metric should prompt a rollback: Describe Changes
Change Reviewer checklist
-
Check if the following applies: - The scheduled day and time of execution of the change is appropriate.
- The change plan is technically accurate.
- The change plan includes estimated timing values based on previous testing.
- The change plan includes a viable rollback plan.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
-
Check if the following applies: - The complexity of the plan is appropriate for the corresponding risk of the change. (i.e. the plan contains clear details).
- The change plan includes success measures for all steps/milestones during the execution.
- The change adequately minimizes risk within the environment/service.
- The performance implications of executing the change are well-understood and documented.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
- If not, is it possible (or necessary) to make changes to observability platforms for added visibility?
- The change has a primary and secondary SRE with knowledge of the details available during the change window.
- The labels blocks deployments and/or blocks feature-flags are applied as necessary
Change Technician checklist
-
Check if all items below are complete: - The change plan is technically accurate.
- This Change Issue is linked to the appropriate Issue and/or Epic
- Change has been tested in staging and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- A dry-run has been conducted and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- The change execution window respects the Production Change Lock periods.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the change event is added to the GitLab Production calendar.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call has been informed prior to change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@sre-oncalland this issue and await their acknowledgement.) - For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call provided approval with the eoc_approved label on the issue.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the Infrastructure Manager provided approval with the manager_approved label on the issue.
- Release managers have been informed (If needed! Cases include DB change) prior to change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@release-managersand this issue and await their acknowledgment.) - There are currently no active incidents that are severity1 or severity2
- If the change involves doing maintenance on a database host, an appropriate silence targeting the host(s) should be added for the duration of the change.