2022-10-17: Oncall schedule shift 1 hour ahead for Oct11-17
Production Change
Change Summary
Applies for all 3 timezones, after coordinating and getting everyone's agreement, PD schedules were shifted to the following times.
New values:
- APAC: 22:00 - 06:00
- EMEA: 06:00 - 14:00
- AMER: 14:00 - 22:00
With the exception that on Tuesday Oct 11, APAC made 23:00-06:00 (7hrs shift), and on Monday Oct 17, APAC might do 22:00-07:00 (9hrs shift).
Previous values:
- APAC: 23:00 - 07:00
- EMEA: 07:00 - 15:00
- AMER: 15:00 - 23:00
Change Details
- Services Impacted - ServiceOncall-Tooling
-
Change Technician -
@rehab - Change Reviewer - @rehab
- Time tracking - 10 minutes
- Downtime Component - none
Detailed steps for the change
Change Steps - steps to take to execute the change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - 5m
-
For each of the first line escalation schedules in https://gitlab.pagerduty.com/escalation_policies#P7IG7DS (except for Shadow schedules): -
Edit this schedule -
Edit under Restrict on-call shifts to specific times -
Enter the values under New values.
-
-
Create an override as needed for the last/first hour of the day of the change. -
Update the handover report schedule to schedule: 1 5,13,21 * * *.❯ glsh kube use-cluster ops ❯ kubectl get cronjobs -n woodhouse ❯ kubectl edit cronjob/woodhouse-handover -n woodhouse -
Merge gitlab-com/gl-infra/k8s-workloads/tanka-deployments!570 (merged).
Rollback
Rollback steps - steps to be taken in the event of a need to rollback this change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - 5m
-
For each of the first line escalation schedules in https://gitlab.pagerduty.com/escalation_policies#P7IG7DS (except for Shadow schedules): -
Edit this schedule -
Edit under Restrict on-call shifts to specific times -
Enter the values under Previous values.
-
-
Revert gitlab-com/gl-infra/k8s-workloads/tanka-deployments!570 (merged) -
Update the handover report schedule to schedule: 1 6,14,22 * * *.❯ glsh kube use-cluster ops ❯ kubectl get cronjobs -n woodhouse ❯ kubectl edit cronjob/woodhouse-handover -n woodhouse
Change Reviewer checklist
-
Check if the following applies: - The scheduled day and time of execution of the change is appropriate.
- The change plan is technically accurate.
- The change plan includes estimated timing values based on previous testing.
- The change plan includes a viable rollback plan.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
-
Check if the following applies: - The complexity of the plan is appropriate for the corresponding risk of the change. (i.e. the plan contains clear details).
- The change plan includes success measures for all steps/milestones during the execution.
- The change adequately minimizes risk within the environment/service.
- The performance implications of executing the change are well-understood and documented.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
- If not, is it possible (or necessary) to make changes to observability platforms for added visibility?
- The change has a primary and secondary SRE with knowledge of the details available during the change window.
- The labels blocks deployments and/or blocks feature-flags are applied as necessary
Change Technician checklist
-
Check if all items below are complete: - The change plan is technically accurate.
- This Change Issue is linked to the appropriate Issue and/or Epic
- Change has been tested in staging and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- A dry-run has been conducted and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- The change execution window respects the Production Change Lock periods.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the change event is added to the GitLab Production calendar.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call has been informed prior to change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@sre-oncalland this issue and await their acknowledgement.) - For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call provided approval with the eoc_approved label on the issue.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the Infrastructure Manager provided approval with the manager_approved label on the issue.
- Release managers have been informed (If needed! Cases include DB change) prior to change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@release-managersand this issue and await their acknowledgment.) - There are currently no active incidents that are severity1 or severity2
- If the change involves doing maintenance on a database host, an appropriate silence targeting the host(s) should be added for the duration of the change.
Edited by Rehab