Disable container_registry_phase_2_deny_list feature flag for VIPs in bulk
Production Change
Change Summary
We're about to start Migrating VIP namespaces for the container registry migration (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/350933).
We need to disable this feature flag (container_registry_phase_2_deny_list) in bulk for all target top-level namespaces.
This is similar to #6817 (closed), but we're disabling the FF instead.
The list of target VIP top-level namespaces can be seen at https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gl-infra/production/-/snippets/2376659. This snippet contains a single JSON file with an array of integers, one for each top-level namespace ID.
This change is to execute a script on a production Rails console that will do the following:
- Read JSON document from the private snippet.
- Iterate over the list of top-level namespace IDs and for each:
- Find the corresponding
Groupobject by ID; - Disable
container_registry_phase_2_deny_listfeature flag for theGroup.
- Find the corresponding
This change won't trigger any application behavior, either on GitLab Rails or the Container Registry, as all the functionality sits behind the container_registry_migration_phase2 feature flag which is disabled. We'll enable this FF once it's safe to do so and we're in a position to monitor the migration.
Related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/350933.
Change Details
- Services Impacted - ServiceGitLab Rails
- Change Technician - @skarbek
- Change Reviewer - @hswimelar
- Time tracking - 10 minutes PER RUN
- Downtime Component - 0
Detailed steps for the change
Pre-Change Steps - steps to be completed before execution of the change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - 5 minutes
-
Set label changein-progress on this issue
Obtain a PAT for the GitLab API with read access to private snippets in this project
Change Steps - steps to take to execute the change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - 5 minutes
-
Open rails console with write access in production
Execute the following script. Make sure to fill the PAT variable with your private access token, acquire the latest SNIPPET_URL from the target comment in this CR, and keep the console open for the validation and rollback steps if necessary:
PAT = "<TOKEN>"
SNIPPET_URL = "<SNIPPET_URL>"
FEATURE_FLAG = :container_registry_phase_2_deny_list
response = Gitlab::HTTP.get(SNIPPET_URL, headers: { 'PRIVATE-TOKEN' => PAT })
ids = JSON.parse(response.body)
puts "Loaded #{ids.size} group IDs"
before_count = Feature::FlipperGate.where(feature_key: FEATURE_FLAG.to_s).count
ids.each do |id|
group = Group.find_by_id(id)
unless group
puts "WARNING: #{id} not found!"
next
end
Feature.disable(FEATURE_FLAG, group)
end
after_count = Feature::FlipperGate.where(feature_key: FEATURE_FLAG.to_s).count
diff_count = before_count - after_count
if diff_count == ids.size
puts "enabled for #{after_count} groups"
else
puts "WARNING: Expected feature flag to be enabled for #{ids.size} groups, but only did for #{diff_count}"
end
Post-Change Steps - steps to take to verify the change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - 1 Minute
-
No WARNING: .*messages should be seen during the execution of the script. Otherwise, report to @hswimelar.
Run /chatops run feature get container_registry_phase_2_deny_list on Slack to ensure the feature flag scope was updated.
Rollback
Rollback steps - steps to be taken in the event of a need to rollback this change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - 2 Minutes
-
Execute the following snippet:
before_count = Feature::FlipperGate.where(feature_key: FEATURE_FLAG.to_s).count
ids.each do |id|
group = Group.find_by_id(id)
Feature.enable(FEATURE_FLAG, group) if group
end
after_count = Feature::FlipperGate.where(feature_key: FEATURE_FLAG.to_s).count
unless after_count == 0
puts "WARNING: Expected feature flag to be disabled for all groups, but #{after_count} remain"
end
Report any WARNING: .* messages to @hswimelar.
Monitoring
Key metrics to observe
This change won't trigger any behavior change, either on GitLab Rails or the Container Registry, as all the functionality sits behind the container_registry_migration_phase2 feature flag.
Change Reviewer checklist
-
Check if the following applies: - The scheduled day and time of execution of the change is appropriate.
- The change plan is technically accurate.
- The change plan includes estimated timing values based on previous testing.
- The change plan includes a viable rollback plan.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
-
Check if the following applies: - The complexity of the plan is appropriate for the corresponding risk of the change. (i.e. the plan contains clear details).
- The change plan includes success measures for all steps/milestones during the execution.
- The change adequately minimizes risk within the environment/service.
- The performance implications of executing the change are well-understood and documented.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
- If not, is it possible (or necessary) to make changes to observability platforms for added visibility?
- The change has a primary and secondary SRE with knowledge of the details available during the change window.
- The labels blocks deployments and/or blocks feature-flags are applied as necessary
Change Technician checklist
-
Check if all items below are complete: - The change plan is technically accurate.
- This Change Issue is linked to the appropriate Issue and/or Epic
- Change has been tested in staging and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- A dry-run has been conducted and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the change event is added to the GitLab Production calendar.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call has been informed prior to change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@sre-oncalland this issue and await their acknowledgement.) - For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call provided approval with the eoc_approved label on the issue.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the Infrastructure Manager provided approval with the manager_approved label on the issue.
- Release managers have been informed (If needed! Cases include DB change) prior to change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@release-managersand this issue and await their acknowledgment.) - There are currently no active incidents that are severity1 or severity2
- If the change involves doing maintenance on a database host, an appropriate silence targeting the host(s) should be added for the duration of the change.