2022-04-18: Firing 1 - Containers for the `web` service, `main` are unable to unable to start.
Incident DRI
Current Status
A bad node in us-east1-b, had non-system pods stuck in the Initialization phase. The difference between that node and another healthy one that was created around the same time has been noted in the comment section, as a way to mitigate the incident, the node was manually drained, then shortly auto-deleted.
The root cause appeared to have been triggered by a recent change, but that root cause follows a series of known issues with Calico.
Summary for CMOC notice / Exec summary:
- Customer Impact: No customers impact.
- Service Impact: ServiceWeb
- Impact Duration: 08:47 UTC - 11:09 UTC (142 minutes)
- Root cause: RootCauseKnown-Software-Issue.
Timeline
Recent Events (available internally only):
- Deployments
- Feature Flag Changes
- Infrastructure Configurations
- GCP Events (e.g. host failure)
- Gitlab.com Latest Updates
All times UTC.
2022-04-18
-
09:07- EOC alerted. -
09:27- @rehab declares incident in Slack. -
11:09- bad node drained. -
11:09- alert cleared. -
11:25- bad node auto-deleted. -
11:38- IncidentMitigated
Create related issues
Use the following links to create related issues to this incident if additional work needs to be completed after it is resolved:
- Support contact request
- Corrective action
- Investigation followup
- Confidential issue
- QA investigation
- Infradev
Takeaways
- ...
Corrective Actions
Corrective actions should be put here as soon as an incident is mitigated, ensure that all corrective actions mentioned in the notes below are included.
- Improve stability of Calico networking components: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gl-infra/reliability/-/issues/14737
- Consider the future of Network Policy and our use of GKE: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gl-infra/reliability/-/issues/14580
Note: In some cases we need to redact information from public view. We only do this in a limited number of documented cases. This might include the summary, timeline or any other bits of information, laid out in out handbook page. Any of this confidential data will be in a linked issue, only visible internally. By default, all information we can share, will be public, in accordance to our transparency value.
Click to expand or collapse the Incident Review section.
Incident Review
-
Ensure that the exec summary is completed at the top of the incident issue, the timeline is updated and relevant graphs are included in the summary -
If there are any corrective action items mentioned in the notes on the incident, ensure they are listed in the "Corrective Action" section -
Fill out relevant sections below or link to the meeting review notes that cover these topics
Customer Impact
-
Who was impacted by this incident? (i.e. external customers, internal customers)
- ...
-
What was the customer experience during the incident? (i.e. preventing them from doing X, incorrect display of Y, ...)
- ...
-
How many customers were affected?
- ...
-
If a precise customer impact number is unknown, what is the estimated impact (number and ratio of failed requests, amount of traffic drop, ...)?
- ...
What were the root causes?
- ...
Incident Response Analysis
-
How was the incident detected?
- ...
-
How could detection time be improved?
- ...
-
How was the root cause diagnosed?
- ...
-
How could time to diagnosis be improved?
- ...
-
How did we reach the point where we knew how to mitigate the impact?
- ...
-
How could time to mitigation be improved?
- ...
-
What went well?
- ...
Post Incident Analysis
-
Did we have other events in the past with the same root cause?
- ...
-
Do we have existing backlog items that would've prevented or greatly reduced the impact of this incident?
- ...
-
Was this incident triggered by a change (deployment of code or change to infrastructure)? If yes, link the issue.
- ...
What went well?
- ...
Guidelines
Resources
- If the Situation Zoom room was utilised, recording will be automatically uploaded to Incident room Google Drive folder (private)