GPRD chunk gitlab-org/search-team/test-public-project into a separate zoekt index
Production Change
Change Summary
As part of supporting large namespaces with zoekt, we'd like to "chunk" a low risk repository into a separate zoekt index. See related issue: gitlab-org/gitlab#471638 (closed)
Change Details
- Services Impacted - zoekt
- Change Technician - @johnmason
- Change Reviewer - @dgruzd
- Time tracking - 1h
- Downtime Component - N/A
Set Maintenance Mode in GitLab
If your change involves scheduled maintenance, add a step to set and unset maintenance mode per our runbooks. This will make sure SLA calculations adjust for the maintenance period.
Detailed steps for the change
Change Steps - steps to take to execute the change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - 1h
-
Set label changein-progress /label ~change::in-progress -
Execute console steps in staging for https://staging.gitlab.com/gitlab-org/dgruzd-search-test/test-project-1 -
Add an incremental change by updating a file with a keyword like 20240725 -
Verify search results are working for group search in staging -
Execute console steps in production for https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/search-team/test-public-project -
Add an incremental change by updating a file with a keyword like 20240725 -
Verify search results are working for production -
Set label changecomplete /label ~change::complete
Rollback
Rollback steps - steps to be taken in the event of a need to rollback this change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - 1h
-
Destroy the zoekt repository -
Destroy the additional zoekt index -
Force reindexing for the affected project -
Set label changeaborted /label ~change::aborted
Monitoring
Key metrics to observe
The biggest thing to monitor is whether incremental changes are searchable.
- Metric: Zoekt indexing failures
- Location: https://log.gprd.gitlab.net/app/dashboards#/view/1a3be100-7fa4-11ee-ac5b-8f88ebd04638?_g=(refreshInterval:(pause:!t,value:60000),time:(from:now-1d,to:now))
- What changes to this metric should prompt a rollback: If there is large spike in indexing failures with affected project, or if the project is no longer searchable.
Change Reviewer checklist
-
Check if the following applies: - The scheduled day and time of execution of the change is appropriate.
- The change plan is technically accurate.
- The change plan includes estimated timing values based on previous testing.
- The change plan includes a viable rollback plan.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
-
Check if the following applies: - The complexity of the plan is appropriate for the corresponding risk of the change. (i.e. the plan contains clear details).
- The change plan includes success measures for all steps/milestones during the execution.
- The change adequately minimizes risk within the environment/service.
- The performance implications of executing the change are well-understood and documented.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
- If not, is it possible (or necessary) to make changes to observability platforms for added visibility?
- The change has a primary and secondary SRE with knowledge of the details available during the change window.
- The change window has been agreed with Release Managers in advance of the change. If the change is planned for APAC hours, this issue has an agreed pre-change approval.
- The labels blocks deployments and/or blocks feature-flags are applied as necessary.
Change Technician checklist
-
Check if all items below are complete: - The change plan is technically accurate.
- This Change Issue is linked to the appropriate Issue and/or Epic
- Change has been tested in staging and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- A dry-run has been conducted and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- The change execution window respects the Production Change Lock periods.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the change event is added to the GitLab Production calendar.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call has been informed prior to change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@sre-oncalland this issue and await their acknowledgement.) - For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call provided approval with the eoc_approved label on the issue.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the Infrastructure Manager provided approval with the manager_approved label on the issue.
- Release managers have been informed prior to any C1, C2, or blocks deployments change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@release-managersand this issue and await their acknowledgment.) - There are currently no active incidents that are severity1 or severity2
- If the change involves doing maintenance on a database host, an appropriate silence targeting the host(s) should be added for the duration of the change.
Edited by Dmitry Gruzd