2023-07-31: unpause XLarge runners in GPRD
Production Change
Change Summary
This issue is created in retrospect for visibility. The XLarge runners were deployed and brought online last week, it wasn't clear whether they were functioning.
Through this slack-thread it was discussed that they're not working as expected, in which we discovered they were paused in GPRD.
This change simply unpauses the XLarge (new offering) runners in GPRD.
Change Details
- Services Impacted - ServiceCI Runners
-
Change Technician -
@rehab
- Change Reviewer - @rehab
- Time tracking - 5 minutes
- Downtime Component - none
Detailed steps for the change
Change Steps - steps to take to execute the change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - 5m
-
Set label changein-progress /label ~change::in-progress
-
Unpause the 10 runner-manager VMs with the tag saas-linux-xlarge-amd64
in https://gitlab.com/admin/runners?tag[]=saas-linux-xlarge-amd64. -
Set label changecomplete /label ~change::complete
Rollback
Rollback steps - steps to be taken in the event of a need to rollback this change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - Estimated Time to Complete in Minutes
-
Pause the 10 runner-manager VMs with the tag saas-linux-xlarge-amd64
in https://gitlab.com/admin/runners?tag[]=saas-linux-xlarge-amd64. -
Set label changeaborted /label ~change::aborted
Monitoring
Key metrics to observe
-
Metric: Kibana logs
- Location: https://log.gprd.gitlab.net/app/r/s/pSv7K
- What changes to this metric should prompt a rollback: Unexpected errors.
-
Metric: Incident Support Autoscaling
- Location: https://dashboards.gitlab.net/goto/OsJ8Dwq4R?orgId=1
- What changes to this metric should prompt a rollback: Growing pending jobs queue, or a sharp decrease on processed jobs.
-
Metric: CI Runners Service Overview
- Location: https://dashboards.gitlab.net/goto/9eowvwqVR?orgId=1
- What changes to this metric should prompt a rollback: Increase in error ratios, or a drop in the Apdex.
Change Reviewer checklist
-
Check if the following applies: - The scheduled day and time of execution of the change is appropriate.
- The change plan is technically accurate.
- The change plan includes estimated timing values based on previous testing.
- The change plan includes a viable rollback plan.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
-
Check if the following applies: - The complexity of the plan is appropriate for the corresponding risk of the change. (i.e. the plan contains clear details).
- The change plan includes success measures for all steps/milestones during the execution.
- The change adequately minimizes risk within the environment/service.
- The performance implications of executing the change are well-understood and documented.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
- If not, is it possible (or necessary) to make changes to observability platforms for added visibility?
- The change has a primary and secondary SRE with knowledge of the details available during the change window.
- The change window has been agreed with Release Managers in advance of the change. If the change is planned for APAC hours, this issue has an agreed pre-change approval.
- The labels blocks deployments and/or blocks feature-flags are applied as necessary.
Change Technician checklist
IMPORTANT: We have modified the approval rules for Change requests until 2023-08-01, after this date this note can be removed:
-
All C1 and C2 change issues require Director level or above approval
-
All C3 change issues require staff+ engineer in Infrastructure to review (
@igorwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
@abrandl
@reprazent
@msmiley
@cmiskell
@nolith
@andrewn
@sxuereb
@jarv
) -
Check if all items below are complete: - The change plan is technically accurate.
- This Change Issue is linked to the appropriate Issue and/or Epic
- Change has been tested in staging and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- A dry-run has been conducted and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- The change execution window respects the Production Change Lock periods.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the change event is added to the GitLab Production calendar.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call has been informed prior to change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@sre-oncall
and this issue and await their acknowledgement.) - For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call provided approval with the eoc_approved label on the issue.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the Infrastructure Manager provided approval with the manager_approved label on the issue.
- Release managers have been informed prior to any C1, C2, or blocks deployments change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@release-managers
and this issue and await their acknowledgment.) - There are currently no active incidents that are severity1 or severity2
- If the change involves doing maintenance on a database host, an appropriate silence targeting the host(s) should be added for the duration of the change.