@rspeicher I decided not to block https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/chatops/-/merge_requests/180 with minor remarks. I've applied one suggestion myself and opened this follow-up to discuss a couple of improvements/comments. The following discussions from https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/chatops/-/merge_requests/180 should be addressed: - [ ] @nolith started a [discussion](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/chatops/-/merge_requests/180#note_508996560): > It seems that we do not support ordering by `finished_at` :( - [x] @nolith started a [discussion](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/chatops/-/merge_requests/180#note_508996567): > I will suggest filtering by `status`, we mentioned quite a few times to start triggering the start of a deployment. It think will be safer here to be specific about what we are looking for. > > ```suggestion:-0+0 > sort: 'desc', > status: 'success', > > ``` > > WDYT?