Skip to content
GitLab
Next
    • GitLab: the DevOps platform
    • Explore GitLab
    • Install GitLab
    • How GitLab compares
    • Get started
    • GitLab docs
    • GitLab Learn
  • Pricing
  • Talk to an expert
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
    Projects Groups Topics Snippets
  • Register
  • Sign in
  • P Product
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Graph
    • Compare revisions
    • Locked files
  • Issues 568
    • Issues 568
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
    • Iterations
  • Merge requests 1
    • Merge requests 1
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
    • Test cases
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Metrics
    • Incidents
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • GitLab.comGitLab.com
  • Product
  • Issues
  • #1563
Closed
Open
Issue created Sep 24, 2020 by Gabe Weaver@gweaver🐣Maintainer

Issue Prioritization Pilot

As part of the working group, we've figured out a potential model that is worth validating via a pilot so we can collect data on its efficiency.

Model Inputs

  • Value: value::low, value::medium, value::high
  • Urgency: urgency::low, urgency::medium, urgency::high
  • Value Profile: reason::grow, reason::protect
  • Create easy to understand definitions for each value label
  • Create easy to understand definitions for each urgency label
  • Create easy to understand definitions for each value profile (other two will come later)
  • Update the Feedback Template with information and context on how to use the labels (and keep them up to date over time)
  • Determine how and where to set the Duration input (estimated weeks to complete issue / epic)

@spouliquen1 ☝ DRI (#1635 (closed))

Label modifiers:

  • value::low = 1
  • value::medium = 2
  • value::high = 3
  • urgency::low = 1
  • urgency::medium = 2
  • urgency::high = 3

SFDC Data:

  • Customer
  • Opportunity value (IACV)
  • Account value (ARR)

Calculate Value

Step 1 - Calculate Value: ** This should include epics AND issue

  • Sum total number of value points for a single customer broken down by value profile.
  • Determine value per point for each value profile. reason::grow (value per point = IACV / value points), reason::protect = (value per point = ARR / value points).
  • Determine customer value for each linked issue. customer issue value = value points x value per point

Step 2 - Calculate Cost of Delay

  • Multiply customer issue value x urgency points = customer cost of delay
  • Average all customer CoD to get a combined issue value - average cost of delay = (customer cost of delay + customer cost of delay...) / total count of customers

Step 3 - Divide by Duration

  • average cost of delay / duration (weeks)

Upgrade User Requested Issues Dashboard & adding more dashboards

  • https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/customer-success/commercial-markets-initiatives/-/issues/137

@dsakamoto ☝ DRI

Push prioritization to Issue in GitLab

  • Determine labeling system that maps Cost of Delay / Duration into some finite amount of ranges that can be mapped to a scoped label set and automatically applied/updated on a given issue.

@gweaver ☝ DRI w/ Data Person

Details

  • The calculations should run on a daily basis and assume that any of the input data is mutable and has changed since the last time the calculations were run.
Edited Dec 17, 2020 by Sophie Pouliquen
Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking