Linspaced from high to low?

Submitted by rom..@..ree.fr

Assigned to Hauke Heibel

Link to original bugzilla bug (#41)
Version: 3.0

Description

Hi,

Just an idea: would it be pertinent to have LinSpaced method work with arguments high->low? It would avoid a reverseInPlace() call just after. I think it is good as it is now, but I was just wondering.

For now, inversed arguments (size, high, low) are accepted, but silently produce wrong linspace vector.

Cheers,

Romain