First sprint for @djudju and @joelamouche on the app

Retrospective:

We achieved a little bit more than half, which is not optimal given that we set out thinking we could have done more and wanted to include extra time as a buffer and to work with Alex.

things that went well:

• the split-up of work was very well, so that we did not experience any blockers and reviewing was quick.

things that could have gone better:

• On one issue (#168 (closed)), we didn't even start implementation and our discussion to reach a conclusion lasted an entire week. Our opinions on how to avoid these (sometimes frustrating discussions) and address these issues faster have not surfaced a solution.

  • possible solution: Identify preliminary solutions and split the issue up into temporary solution-issue and discussion-issue.

• On another issue (#187 (moved)), too much time was spent, given that it was of rather low-priority. Learning: Before tackling an issue, it might make sense to set a time-limit after which one either decides whether to go on. If not, maybe save one's work into an MR and amrk it as WIP, or leave helpful descriptions/learnings on the issue itself.