Commit ebf4b86c authored by Ellie's avatar Ellie

slides for week 3, little fixes

parent 82f9e99a
......@@ -28,4 +28,4 @@ The combined prepared reading reflection + in-class writing response will be gra
|---:|--:|:---|
| **✔+** | 3 | **Exceeds Expectations**: it is clear that you fully understood the reading. Both the prepared response and the in-class writing contain insightful and original ideas or questions that bring your own expertise and experience to bear on the topic. The response could be used as an example of an excellent reading response in future classes. |
|**✔** | 2.6 | **Satisfactory**: Response is complete and it is clear that you actually did the reading and understood most of it. However, your response may not show your own substantive engagement with the topic. |
|**✔-** | 2.1 | **Unsatisfactory**: Your response is incomplete or lacks concrete evidence that you read beyond the title or first few paragraphs. Perhaps you did not complete the in-class portion, your prepared response only responds to some of the prompts, is too short to fully address the prompt(s), or shows significant gaps in your understanding of the material. |
\ No newline at end of file
|**✔-** | 2.1 | **Unsatisfactory**: Your response is incomplete or lacks concrete evidence that you read beyond the title or first few paragraphs. Perhaps you did not complete the in-class portion, your prepared response only responds to some of the prompts, is too short to fully address the prompt(s), or shows significant gaps in your understanding of the material. |
......@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ You may take field notes in a medium of your choice (e.g., on your phone, laptop
If you choose this option for pat 1, you should conduct a mini lit review to help you better understand your problem space. This review should include at least 2 academic research publications in the area of your project. It may additionally include some market research in which you look at existing products in your area of interest.
The goal of this part of the project is to help you better understand the current situation with regards to your topic area. For some of your pojects, this might be far more valuable than conducting raw observations.
The goal of this part of the project is to help you better understand the current situation with regards to your topic area. For some of your pojects, this might be far more valuable than conducting raw observations.
The research publications you look at do **not** need to be specifically related to technology. They _might_ be, but you might also think about who might be a domain expert relevant to your project. For example, in the kids toothbrush design video, we could go look ourselves at how children use toothbrushes to realize they need bigger handles than adults ... or we could talk to any Kindergarten teacher or parent of a young child to better understand how other kinds of things are designed for kids (e.g., jumbo crayons!).
......@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ _Note: this section will change_
1. Create a prototype! See prototyping tools section above.
- Your prototype must be detailed enough to allow you to examine at least one of the use cases described in your storyboards turned in for the last milestone. If you have a concern about this, please meet with me about an appropriate scope for your prototype.
2. Evaluate your prototype ...
- Choose and conduct 2 evaluations from this list:
- Choose and conduct 2 evaluations from this list:
- TODO: create new forms for each.
- **Heuristics Evaluation**: Choose one of the heuristics lists discussed in class and evaluate your design based on that list. How well does your design uphold each principle?
- **Human Factors Check**: Use the human factors checklist you developed in class at the end of Week 8 to evaluate your prototype. How well does your design meet each item in the checklist?
......
......@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ You can earn a maximum of 3 extra points on your final score if you complete all
**Link**: <https://portlandstate.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_2fRj80levpPZGT3>
**Readings**:
**Readings** (read both):
- Baumer, Eric P S, and M Six Silberman. 2011. "When the Implication Is Not to Design (Technology)." In *Proc. CHI 2011*, 2271--2274. CHI '11. Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM. <https://dl-acm-org.proxy.lib.pdx.edu/citation.cfm?doid=1978942.1979275>.
- Sullivan, Paul. 2014. “Stop Jumping to Solutions and Think About the Problem.” ThoughtWorks (blog). October 27, 2014. <https://www.thoughtworks.com/insights/blog/you-need-understand-problem>.
......@@ -153,7 +153,23 @@ You can earn a maximum of 3 extra points on your final score if you complete all
#### RR5: TBA
#### RR5: Critical Design
**Due**: Week 4, Meeting 2
**Link**: <#>
**Readings** (choose 1):
- Gaver, Bill, and Heather Martin. “Alternatives: Exploring Information Appliances Through Conceptual Design Proposals.” In _Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems_, 209–216. CHI ’00. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2000. <https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332433>
- Steup, Rosemary, Lynn Dombrowski, and Norman Makoto Su. 2019. “Feeding the World with Data: Visions of Data-Driven Farming.” In _Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference_, 1503–15. DIS ’19. New York, NY, USA: ACM. <https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322382>.
- **If you chose Gaver & Martin:**
1.
2.
- **If you chose Steup et al.:**
1.
2.
#### RR6: TBA
......
......@@ -13,16 +13,16 @@ menu:
| Week | Meeting 1 | Meeting 2 | Sunday, 11:59 |
|:--|:--|:--|:--|
| [1](#week-1) | Observing | Project Intro [RR1](https://portlandstate.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_b2cTIT7tV7k7i73) | [Intro Survey](https://portlandstate.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3kH2FR8nxeay7WJ)|
| [2](#week-2) | What is UX? | [[S1](../sketching/)] Ethics [RR2](https://portlandstate.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3QQPdycjRbFMa1f) | [D0](../project/#d0-team-contract) |
| [1](#week-1) | Observing | Project Intro [RR1](../readings/) | [Intro Survey](https://portlandstate.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3kH2FR8nxeay7WJ)|
| [2](#week-2) | What is UX? | [[S1](../sketching/)] Ethics [RR2](../readings/) | [D0](../project/#d0-team-contract) |
| [3](#week-3) | | [[S2](../sketching/)] Interviewing <br/> **_Meeting on T+W only_** | |
| [4](#week-4) | Values [RR3](https://portlandstate.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_af4qLWgp4Pvdlg9) | [[S3](../sketching/)] Problems [RR4](#)| |
| [5](#week-5) | Critical Design [RR5](#) | [[S4](../sketching/)] Data | |
| [6](#week-6) | [Presentation I](../project/#d1p-research-presentation) | [[S5](../sketching/)] Inclusion [RR6](#) | [D1](../project/#d1-research-report--problem-statement) |
| [4](#week-4) | Values [RR3](../readings/) | [[S3](../sketching/)] Problems [RR4](../readings/)| |
| [5](#week-5) | Critical Design [RR5](../readings/) | [[S4](../sketching/)] Data | |
| [6](#week-6) | [Presentation I](../project/#d1p-research-presentation) | [[S5](../sketching/)] Inclusion [RR6](../readings/) | [D1](../project/#d1-research-report--problem-statement) |
| [7](#week-7) | Brainstorming | [[S6](../sketching/)] Storyboarding | |
| [8](#week-8) | Human Factors [RR7](#) | [[S7](../sketching/)] Prototyping & Evaluation| [D2](../project/#d2-design-proposal) |
| [9](#week-9) | HCI History [RR8](#) | [[S8](../sketching/)] HCI Present [RR9](#) | |
| [10](#week-10) | Traps & Persuasion [RR10](#) | Troubling Design [RR11](#) | [D3](../project/#d3-design-case-study) |
| [8](#week-8) | Human Factors [RR7](../readings/) | [[S7](../sketching/)] Prototyping & Evaluation| [D2](../project/#d2-design-proposal) |
| [9](#week-9) | HCI History [RR8](../readings/) | [[S8](../sketching/)] HCI Present [RR9](../readings/) | |
| [10](#week-10) | Traps & Persuasion [RR10](../readings/) | Troubling Design [RR11](../readings/) | [D3](../project/#d3-design-case-study) |
| [F](#finals-week) | Final: [Presentation II](../project/#d3p-final-presentation) | Friday: [Final Reflection](../individual-reflections/#ir-individual-reflection) | |
**Finals Week:** The final meeting is [scheduled by the registrar and is considered an integral part of the course](https://www.pdx.edu/registration/final-exams). Make plans now to attend at the proper time for your section.
......@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ Class will meet only once this week, on either Tuesday or Wednesday depending on
- Spradley, James P. 1979. Selected excerpts from *The Ethnographic Interview*: 'Asking Descriptive Questions' (pp. 78-91, _required_); 'Interviewing an Informant' (pp. 55-67, _recommended_). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [PDF (Google Drive)](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1INwKT1h4YDlpK92NiFVJ5i9MMehnTSEa/view?usp=sharing)
- Vido: Tate, Emily. “Cognitive Biases & The Questions You Shouldn’t Be Asking by Cindy Alvarez.” _Mind the Product (blog)_, August 3, 2018. <https://www.mindtheproduct.com/cognitive-biases-the-questions-you-shouldnt-be-asking-by-cindy-alvarez/>
- In Class:
- [Slides](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Jmbtni7c0ohZJfjfGV82n3goIrtJhKvF/view?usp=sharing)
- [Sketch 2](../sketching/)
- Develop Interview Questions
......@@ -160,7 +161,7 @@ Class will meet only once this week, on either Tuesday or Wednesday depending on
When design isn't about fixing things
- Read Before Class (choose 1) [[RR5](#)]: <!-- TODO: RR5 survey -->
- Read Before Class (choose 1) [[RR5](../readings/)]:
- Gaver, Bill, and Heather Martin. “Alternatives: Exploring Information Appliances Through Conceptual Design Proposals.” In _Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems_, 209–216. CHI ’00. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2000. <https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332433>
- Steup, Rosemary, Lynn Dombrowski, and Norman Makoto Su. 2019. “Feeding the World with Data: Visions of Data-Driven Farming.” In _Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference_, 1503–15. DIS ’19. New York, NY, USA: ACM. <https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322382>.
- In Class:
......@@ -189,7 +190,7 @@ When design isn't about fixing things
#### Meeting 2: Inclusion
- Read Before Class [[RR6](#)] <!-- TODO: RR6 survey link -->
- Read Before Class [[RR6](../readings/)]
- Choice 1:
- Schulman, Sarah. 2016. "Redefining the Politics of Inclusion with George and Dustin." *The Journal of Design Strategies* 8 (1): 50--55. <https://issuu.com/journalofdesignstrategies/docs/the_journal_of_design_strategies_vo>. [Alternate PDF (GDrive)](https://drive.google.com/open?id=1I_wIhqt-6o36zVHpIaeD8PF8MbsbHmEC)
- Martin, Courtney. 2016. "The Reductive Seduction of Other People's Problems." *BRIGHT Magazine (Medium)*, January. <https://brightthemag.com/the-reductive-seduction-of-other-people-s-problems-3c07b307732d>.
......@@ -235,7 +236,7 @@ When design isn't about fixing things
In this class we will look at some things we already know about people! And discuss how this knowledge can be applied to design. It is not always necessary to reinvent the wheel with new research ;)
- Read Before Class [[RR7](#)]: <!-- TODO: RR7 survey link --> <!-- TODO: assign groups for this -->
- Read Before Class [[RR7](../readings/)]:
1. **Fitt's Law**: Karafillis, Anastasios. 2012. "When You Shouldn't Use Fitts Law To Measure User Experience." *Smashing Magazine (Online Magazine)*, December. <https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2012/12/fittss-law-and-user-experience/>.
2. **Affordances**: Gaver, William W. 1991. "Technology Affordances." In *Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems*, 79--84. CHI '91. New York, NY, USA: ACM. <http://doi.acm.org.proxy.lib.pdx.edu/10.1145/108844.108856>.
3. **Mental Models**: TBA <!-- TODO: find good reading --> pp. 88-92, textbook?
......@@ -278,7 +279,7 @@ In this class we will look at some things we already know about people! And disc
#### Meeting 1: HCI History
- Read Before Class [[RR8](#)]: <!-- TODO: RR8 survey link -->
- Read Before Class [[RR8](../readings/)]:
- Moggridge, Bill. 2007. "Interviews with Stu Card and Tim Mott." In *Designing Interactions*, 1st ed. MIT Press. [PDF (GDrive)](https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xmvq9cxq3kwwTA8Iv2v-udZ3_CLmGTK1)
- In Class:
- [Sketch 3](../sketching/)
......@@ -287,7 +288,7 @@ In this class we will look at some things we already know about people! And disc
#### Meeting 2: HCI Present
- Read Before Class [[RR9](#)]: <!-- TODO: RR9 survey link -->
- Read Before Class [[RR9](../readings/)]:
- Taylor, Alex. “After Interaction.” _Interactions_ 22, no. 5 (August 2015): 48–53. <http://doi.acm.org.proxy.lib.pdx.edu/10.1145/2809888>.
- Khovanskaya, Vera, Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, Matthias Korn, Ann Light, Michael Stewart, and Amy Voida. “Designing Against the Status Quo.” _Interactions_ 25, no. 2 (February 2018): 64–67. <https://doi.org/10.1145/3178560>.
- Dourish, Paul. “User Experience As Legitimacy Trap.” _Interactions_ 26, no. 6 (October 2019): 46–49. <https://doi.org/10.1145/3358908>.
......@@ -299,7 +300,7 @@ In this class we will look at some things we already know about people! And disc
#### Meeting 1: Traps & Persuasion
- Read Before Class (choose one from each list) [[RR10](#)]: <!-- TODO: RR10 survey link -->
- Read Before Class (choose one from each list) [[RR10](../readings/)]:
- **Traps/Persuasion (choose one):**
- Seaver, Nick. 2018. "Captivating Algorithms: Recommender Systems as Traps." *Journal of Material Culture*, December. <https://doi-org.proxy.lib.pdx.edu/10.1177/1359183518820366>.
- <!-- TODO: a persuasive design paper -->
......@@ -312,7 +313,7 @@ In this class we will look at some things we already know about people! And disc
#### Meeting 2: Troubling Design
- Read Before Class [[RR11](#)]: <!-- TODO: RR11 survey link -->
- Read Before Class [[RR11](../readings/)]:
- Choose _one_:
- Irani, Lilly C., and M. Six Silberman. 2016. "Stories We Tell About Labor: Turkopticon and the Trouble with 'Design.'" In *Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems*, 4573--4586. CHI '16. New York, NY, USA: ACM. <http://doi.acm.org.proxy.lib.pdx.edu/10.1145/2858036.2858592>.
- Srinivasan, Janaki, Megan Finn, and Morgan Ames. 2017. “Information Determinism: The Consequences of the Faith in Information.” _The Information Society_ 33 (1): 13–22. <https://www-tandfonline-com.proxy.lib.pdx.edu/doi/full/10.1080/01972243.2016.1248613>.
......
......@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ Or <a href="/~harmon8/faq#meetings-with-me">by appointment</a></p>
<li><a href="#rr2-hci--research-ethics">RR2: HCI + Research Ethics</a></li>
<li><a href="#rr3-values">RR3: Values</a></li>
<li><a href="#rr4-problems--solutions">RR4: Problems & Solutions</a></li>
<li><a href="#rr5-tba">RR5: TBA</a></li>
<li><a href="#rr5-critical-design">RR5: Critical Design</a></li>
<li><a href="#rr6-tba">RR6: TBA</a></li>
<li><a href="#rr7-tba">RR7: TBA</a></li>
<li><a href="#rr8-tba">RR8: TBA</a></li>
......@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ Or <a href="/~harmon8/faq#meetings-with-me">by appointment</a></p>
<h4 id="rr4-problems--solutions">RR4: Problems &amp; Solutions</h4>
<p><strong>Due</strong>: Week 4, Meeting 2</p>
<p><strong>Link</strong>: <a href="https://portlandstate.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_2fRj80levpPZGT3">https://portlandstate.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_2fRj80levpPZGT3</a></p>
<p><strong>Readings</strong>:</p>
<p><strong>Readings</strong> (read both):</p>
<ul>
<li>Baumer, Eric P S, and M Six Silberman. 2011. &ldquo;When the Implication Is Not to Design (Technology).&rdquo; In <em>Proc. CHI 2011</em>, 2271&ndash;2274. CHI &lsquo;11. Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM. <a href="https://dl-acm-org.proxy.lib.pdx.edu/citation.cfm?doid=1978942.1979275">https://dl-acm-org.proxy.lib.pdx.edu/citation.cfm?doid=1978942.1979275</a>.</li>
<li>Sullivan, Paul. 2014. “Stop Jumping to Solutions and Think About the Problem.” ThoughtWorks (blog). October 27, 2014. <a href="https://www.thoughtworks.com/insights/blog/you-need-understand-problem">https://www.thoughtworks.com/insights/blog/you-need-understand-problem</a>.</li>
......@@ -372,7 +372,28 @@ Or <a href="/~harmon8/faq#meetings-with-me">by appointment</a></p>
<li>What do you think Baumer &amp; Silberman would say in response to Sullivan’s article? Do they think problem identification as Sullivan describes it is necessarily bad? How would you describe the fundamental conflict between the two articles?</li>
<li>Thinking across both readings for today, identify one new question you have or one takeaway for you from these readings. Why is this question or takeaway important to you? Does it relate to previous course readings or discussions at all?</li>
</ol>
<h4 id="rr5-tba">RR5: TBA</h4>
<h4 id="rr5-critical-design">RR5: Critical Design</h4>
<p><strong>Due</strong>: Week 4, Meeting 2</p>
<p><strong>Link</strong>: &lt;#&gt;</p>
<p><strong>Readings</strong> (choose 1):</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Gaver, Bill, and Heather Martin. “Alternatives: Exploring Information Appliances Through Conceptual Design Proposals.” In <em>Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems</em>, 209–216. CHI ’00. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2000. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332433">https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332433</a></p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Steup, Rosemary, Lynn Dombrowski, and Norman Makoto Su. 2019. “Feeding the World with Data: Visions of Data-Driven Farming.” In <em>Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference</em>, 1503–15. DIS ’19. New York, NY, USA: ACM. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322382">https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322382</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>If you chose Gaver &amp; Martin:</strong>
1.
2.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>If you chose Steup et al.:</strong>
1.
2.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<h4 id="rr6-tba">RR6: TBA</h4>
<h4 id="rr7-tba">RR7: TBA</h4>
<h4 id="rr8-tba">RR8: TBA</h4>
......
......@@ -277,13 +277,13 @@ Or <a href="/~harmon8/faq#meetings-with-me">by appointment</a></p>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="#week-1">1</a></td>
<td align="left">Observing</td>
<td align="left">Project Intro <a href="https://portlandstate.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_b2cTIT7tV7k7i73">RR1</a></td>
<td align="left">Project Intro <a href="../readings/">RR1</a></td>
<td align="left"><a href="https://portlandstate.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3kH2FR8nxeay7WJ">Intro Survey</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="#week-2">2</a></td>
<td align="left">What is UX?</td>
<td align="left">[<a href="../sketching/">S1</a>] Ethics <a href="https://portlandstate.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3QQPdycjRbFMa1f">RR2</a></td>
<td align="left">[<a href="../sketching/">S1</a>] Ethics <a href="../readings/">RR2</a></td>
<td align="left"><a href="../project/#d0-team-contract">D0</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
......@@ -294,20 +294,20 @@ Or <a href="/~harmon8/faq#meetings-with-me">by appointment</a></p>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="#week-4">4</a></td>
<td align="left">Values <a href="https://portlandstate.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_af4qLWgp4Pvdlg9">RR3</a></td>
<td align="left">[<a href="../sketching/">S3</a>] Problems <a href="#">RR4</a></td>
<td align="left">Values <a href="../readings/">RR3</a></td>
<td align="left">[<a href="../sketching/">S3</a>] Problems <a href="../readings/">RR4</a></td>
<td align="left"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="#week-5">5</a></td>
<td align="left">Critical Design <a href="#">RR5</a></td>
<td align="left">Critical Design <a href="../readings/">RR5</a></td>
<td align="left">[<a href="../sketching/">S4</a>] Data</td>
<td align="left"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="#week-6">6</a></td>
<td align="left"><a href="../project/#d1p-research-presentation">Presentation I</a></td>
<td align="left">[<a href="../sketching/">S5</a>] Inclusion <a href="#">RR6</a></td>
<td align="left">[<a href="../sketching/">S5</a>] Inclusion <a href="../readings/">RR6</a></td>
<td align="left"><a href="../project/#d1-research-report--problem-statement">D1</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
......@@ -318,20 +318,20 @@ Or <a href="/~harmon8/faq#meetings-with-me">by appointment</a></p>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="#week-8">8</a></td>
<td align="left">Human Factors <a href="#">RR7</a></td>
<td align="left">Human Factors <a href="../readings/">RR7</a></td>
<td align="left">[<a href="../sketching/">S7</a>] Prototyping &amp; Evaluation</td>
<td align="left"><a href="../project/#d2-design-proposal">D2</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="#week-9">9</a></td>
<td align="left">HCI History <a href="#">RR8</a></td>
<td align="left">[<a href="../sketching/">S8</a>] HCI Present <a href="#">RR9</a></td>
<td align="left">HCI History <a href="../readings/">RR8</a></td>
<td align="left">[<a href="../sketching/">S8</a>] HCI Present <a href="../readings/">RR9</a></td>
<td align="left"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="#week-10">10</a></td>
<td align="left">Traps &amp; Persuasion <a href="#">RR10</a></td>
<td align="left">Troubling Design <a href="#">RR11</a></td>
<td align="left">Traps &amp; Persuasion <a href="../readings/">RR10</a></td>
<td align="left">Troubling Design <a href="../readings/">RR11</a></td>
<td align="left"><a href="../project/#d3-design-case-study">D3</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
......@@ -462,6 +462,7 @@ Or <a href="/~harmon8/faq#meetings-with-me">by appointment</a></p>
</li>
<li>In Class:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Jmbtni7c0ohZJfjfGV82n3goIrtJhKvF/view?usp=sharing">Slides</a></li>
<li><a href="../sketching/">Sketch 2</a></li>
<li>Develop Interview Questions</li>
</ul>
......@@ -510,7 +511,7 @@ Or <a href="/~harmon8/faq#meetings-with-me">by appointment</a></p>
<h4 id="meeting-1-critical-design">Meeting 1: Critical Design</h4>
<p>When design isn't about fixing things</p>
<ul>
<li>Read Before Class (choose 1) [<a href="#">RR5</a>]: <!-- TODO: RR5 survey -->
<li>Read Before Class (choose 1) [<a href="../readings/">RR5</a>]:
<ul>
<li>Gaver, Bill, and Heather Martin. “Alternatives: Exploring Information Appliances Through Conceptual Design Proposals.” In <em>Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems</em>, 209–216. CHI ’00. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2000. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332433">https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332433</a></li>
<li>Steup, Rosemary, Lynn Dombrowski, and Norman Makoto Su. 2019. “Feeding the World with Data: Visions of Data-Driven Farming.” In <em>Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference</em>, 1503–15. DIS ’19. New York, NY, USA: ACM. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322382">https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322382</a>.</li>
......@@ -546,7 +547,7 @@ Or <a href="/~harmon8/faq#meetings-with-me">by appointment</a></p>
<p><a href="../project/#d1p-research-presentation">D1P: Research Presentation</a></p>
<h4 id="meeting-2-inclusion">Meeting 2: Inclusion</h4>
<ul>
<li>Read Before Class [<a href="#">RR6</a>] <!-- TODO: RR6 survey link -->
<li>Read Before Class [<a href="../readings/">RR6</a>]
<ul>
<li>Choice 1:
<ul>
......@@ -614,7 +615,7 @@ Or <a href="/~harmon8/faq#meetings-with-me">by appointment</a></p>
<h4 id="meeting-1-human-factors">Meeting 1: Human Factors</h4>
<p>In this class we will look at some things we already know about people! And discuss how this knowledge can be applied to design. It is not always necessary to reinvent the wheel with new research ;)</p>
<ul>
<li>Read Before Class [<a href="#">RR7</a>]: <!-- TODO: RR7 survey link --> <!-- TODO: assign groups for this -->
<li>Read Before Class [<a href="../readings/">RR7</a>]:
<ol>
<li><strong>Fitt's Law</strong>: Karafillis, Anastasios. 2012. &ldquo;When You Shouldn't Use Fitts Law To Measure User Experience.&rdquo; <em>Smashing Magazine (Online Magazine)</em>, December. <a href="https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2012/12/fittss-law-and-user-experience/">https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2012/12/fittss-law-and-user-experience/</a>.</li>
<li><strong>Affordances</strong>: Gaver, William W. 1991. &ldquo;Technology Affordances.&rdquo; In <em>Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems</em>, 79&ndash;84. CHI &lsquo;91. New York, NY, USA: ACM. <a href="http://doi.acm.org.proxy.lib.pdx.edu/10.1145/108844.108856">http://doi.acm.org.proxy.lib.pdx.edu/10.1145/108844.108856</a>.</li>
......@@ -685,7 +686,7 @@ Or <a href="/~harmon8/faq#meetings-with-me">by appointment</a></p>
<h3 id="week-9">Week 9</h3>
<h4 id="meeting-1-hci-history">Meeting 1: HCI History</h4>
<ul>
<li>Read Before Class [<a href="#">RR8</a>]: <!-- TODO: RR8 survey link -->
<li>Read Before Class [<a href="../readings/">RR8</a>]:
<ul>
<li>Moggridge, Bill. 2007. &ldquo;Interviews with Stu Card and Tim Mott.&rdquo; In <em>Designing Interactions</em>, 1st ed. MIT Press. <a href="https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xmvq9cxq3kwwTA8Iv2v-udZ3_CLmGTK1">PDF (GDrive)</a></li>
</ul>
......@@ -699,7 +700,7 @@ Or <a href="/~harmon8/faq#meetings-with-me">by appointment</a></p>
</ul>
<h4 id="meeting-2-hci-present">Meeting 2: HCI Present</h4>
<ul>
<li>Read Before Class [<a href="#">RR9</a>]: <!-- TODO: RR9 survey link -->
<li>Read Before Class [<a href="../readings/">RR9</a>]:
<ul>
<li>Taylor, Alex. “After Interaction.” <em>Interactions</em> 22, no. 5 (August 2015): 48–53. <a href="http://doi.acm.org.proxy.lib.pdx.edu/10.1145/2809888">http://doi.acm.org.proxy.lib.pdx.edu/10.1145/2809888</a>.</li>
<li>Khovanskaya, Vera, Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, Matthias Korn, Ann Light, Michael Stewart, and Amy Voida. “Designing Against the Status Quo.” <em>Interactions</em> 25, no. 2 (February 2018): 64–67. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/3178560">https://doi.org/10.1145/3178560</a>.</li>
......@@ -716,7 +717,7 @@ Or <a href="/~harmon8/faq#meetings-with-me">by appointment</a></p>
<h3 id="week-10">Week 10</h3>
<h4 id="meeting-1-traps--persuasion">Meeting 1: Traps &amp; Persuasion</h4>
<ul>
<li>Read Before Class (choose one from each list) [<a href="#">RR10</a>]: <!-- TODO: RR10 survey link -->
<li>Read Before Class (choose one from each list) [<a href="../readings/">RR10</a>]:
<ul>
<li><strong>Traps/Persuasion (choose one):</strong>
<ul>
......@@ -746,7 +747,7 @@ Or <a href="/~harmon8/faq#meetings-with-me">by appointment</a></p>
<h4 id="meeting-2-troubling-design">Meeting 2: Troubling Design</h4>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Read Before Class [<a href="#">RR11</a>]: <!-- TODO: RR11 survey link --></p>
<p>Read Before Class [<a href="../readings/">RR11</a>]:</p>
<ul>
<li>Choose <em>one</em>:
<ul>
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment