ISSNs from facet response in staging are in the different format than production
ISSNs in the response from production have the format http://id.crossref.org/issn/0931-7597
:
https://api.crossref.org/works?rows=0&facet=issn:10
In staging, the same result gives only 0931-7597
:
https://api.staging.crossref.org/works?rows=0&facet=issn:10
Definition of done
-
Available via a staging URL -
Code reviewed -
Unit tests identified, implemented, and passing -
Public documentation reviewed and updated -
Knowledge base reviewed and updated -
Acceptance criteria met -
ISSN facet responses should be formatted a la http://id.crossref.org/issn/0931-7597
as it is in production. -
Filtering and faceting queries should continue to work
-
Note
- The implementation should probably follow the example of other similar IDs such as DOI or ORCID.
Edited by Patrick Polischuk