# Background [comment]: # (If this is a bug, fill in the following sections) Looking at the documentation here: https://citation.crosscite.org/docs.html And running this command: `curl -LH "Accept: text/x-bibliography; style=apa" https://doi.org/10.1575/1912/931` The publisher is not listed in the response, even if we use the example command from the docs page: `curl -LH "Accept: text/x-bibliography; style=apa" https://doi.org/10.1126/science.169.3946.635` # Observed behavior The result that actually shows is: > Frank, H. S. (1970). The Structure of Ordinary Water: New data and interpretations are yielding new insights into this fascinating substance. Science, 169(3946), 635–641. doi:10.1126/science.169.3946.635 [comment]: # (Please provide as many details as you can about steps to reproduce, operating system, browser, and version used, screenshots, example submission IDs, example XML, example queries, etc) # Expected behavior It says it should return: > Frank, H. S. (1970). The Structure of Ordinary Water: New data and interpretations are yielding new insights into this fascinating substance. Science, 169(3946), 635-641. American Association for the Advancement of Science AAAS (Science). doi:10.1126/science.169.3946.635 [comment]: # (What did you expect to happen before you observed the anomalous behavior?) [comment]: # (There are myriad factors that go into prioritizing and scheduling development work, but any information you can provide to help us understand severity, urgency, relative priority, or deadlines, is much appreciated.) [comment]: # (No need to update the Definition of ready when filing issues, but feel free to have a go if you're familiar with the territory.) # Definition of ready - [x] Product owner: @ppolischuk1 - [ ] Tech lead: - [x] Service:: label applied - [ ] Definition of done updated - [ ] Acceptance testing plan: - [ ] Weight applied [comment]: # (Feel free to leave this as is, or suggest changes. We'll update these during Backlog Refinement, prior to bringing this into a sprint.) # Definition of done - [ ] Unit tests identified, implemented, and passing - [ ] Code reviewed - [ ] Available for acceptance testing via a staging URL, or otherwise - [ ] Consider any impacts to current or future architecture/infrastructure, and update specifications and documentation as needed - [ ] Knowledge base reviewed and updated - [ ] Public documentation reviewed and updated - [ ] Acceptance criteria met - [ ] AC 1 - [ ] AC 2 - [ ] Acceptance testing passed # Notes [comment]: # (By default all issues need to be labeled Planning::New, only remove if you know what you're doing)