Commit f939f24b authored by 127.0.0.1's avatar 127.0.0.1 Committed by amnesia

Comments on including additional debugging info

parent 9b90368e
......@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Already done
============
* a small pyGTK application asking very simple questions and sending
an encrypted e-mail ([[whisperback-1.1-beta.tar.gz]]) to...
an encrypted e-mail ([[whisperback-1.1-beta2.tar.gz]]) to...
* a SMTP server behind a hidden service, only allowing to relay e-mail
to the dev collective address
......@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ _Nota bene_:
compromise the *real* users.
> Agreed. I imported this script and adapted it a bit.
>
>
> Pending questions:
>
> 1. How useful would the cleaned-up `ifconfig` and `iwconfig`
......@@ -53,9 +53,14 @@ _Nota bene_:
> 2. After testing this script, I can't think of any other
> privacy-sensitive information that needs to be cleaned-up.
> Any idea?
>> I don't like the idea that this script being defaults, as I fear
>> that the information that it discloses give the machine model.
> 3. Should this be an option provided in the GUI? If yes, opt-in or
> opt-out? I believe we should make this the default, not provide
> any way to disable it, but warn the user about it and display
> a link to inspect the tarball's content. What do you think?
>> As a result of comment in #2, I would prefere an option in the
>> GUI, and preferabily an opt-in. But it could be answered that the
>> mail will be encrypted and on opt-out could not be *so* bad...
> 4. What would be the files to copy on Debian instead of the Gentoo's
> `/etc/sysconfig/*`?
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment