Skip to content
GitLab
    • GitLab: the DevOps platform
    • Explore GitLab
    • Install GitLab
    • How GitLab compares
    • Get started
    • GitLab docs
    • GitLab Learn
  • Pricing
  • Talk to an expert
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
    • Switch to GitLab Next
    Projects Groups Snippets
  • Sign up now
  • Login
  • Sign in / Register
  • Ercoin Ercoin
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 1
    • Issues 1
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 0
    • Merge requests 0
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Container Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • ErcoinErcoin
  • ErcoinErcoin
  • Merge requests
  • !4

Change fee deposit granting

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Merged Krzysztof Jurewicz requested to merge KrzysiekJ/ercoin:fees into master Jan 03, 2018
  • Overview 0
  • Commits 1
  • Pipelines 0
  • Changes 5

Fee deposit has been divided into short (fees paid for current processing) and long (fees paid for long term storage).

At the end of every epoch, short fee deposit and part of long fee deposit are divided between those validators that have less than 2/3 of absencies in block signatures, proportionally to their voting power. The sharp threshold intends to disincentivize censorship attacks.

Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: fees