Follow-up from "Some little documentation fixes"

The following discussion from !326 (merged) should be addressed:

• @tristanvb started a discussion:

  This uncovers something i've been forgetting to resolve.

  While it might have been true when i originally wrote the first docs, it is incorrect to make the statement that the docs in general are "Copyright Codethink", or that the "Author is me", we should really change this to something more neutral.